A new report from the Global Center on AI Governance (GCG), produced with the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria, reveals significant gaps in artificial intelligence (AI) oversight across Africa and emphasizes the need for locally grounded frameworks for digital rights and tech justice.
What happened
The report, titled “Tech Justice in Africa,” highlights that while AI adoption accelerates across the continent, 30 of 40 assessed African countries lack comprehensive safeguards governing AI use, raising concerns about the widening gap between AI deployment and protection of citizens. The research shows that global AI ethics frameworks often overlook Africa’s specific socio-political contexts and the lingering impacts of colonialism on technology design and governance.
The study points to persistent challenges such as limited regulatory enforcement, shrinking civic spaces, and corporate practices that prioritize profit over rights. These conditions contribute to individuals’ uncertainty about seeking redress for AI-related harms and the marginalization of local voices in defining fairness and justice.
Country case studies in Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa illustrate diverse but interconnected issues. In Nigeria, algorithm-driven labor exploitation affects gig workers; Kenya faces online violence against activists amid growing digital civic engagement; and South Africa struggles with digital inequality despite progress in responsible AI policies.
Why it matters
This report matters because it challenges prevailing narratives that portray Africa merely as a market for AI opportunities or risks, instead emphasizing the continent’s role in shaping digital governance and justice. With Africa’s young and tech-curious population growing rapidly, understanding and addressing AI harms in context is crucial for protecting human rights and promoting equitable development.
Moreover, as global investors and policymakers increasingly focus on African data and labor resources, incorporating African perspectives and equitable governance mechanisms is essential to prevent exploitative “digital colonialism” patterns. The report’s insights call for stronger institutional frameworks and harmonized regulations that reflect lived realities rather than abstract principles.
Background
The concept of “digital colonialism” referenced in the report links current AI development to historical patterns of extraction and marginalization rooted in Africa’s colonial past. Key infrastructure, including undersea cables, often follows routes established during the slave trade, symbolizing the continuity of external control over African digital economies.
Prior efforts to regulate AI and digital technologies at the continental and national levels are hindered by resource constraints and fragmented approaches. While institutions such as the African Court and African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights provide some legal oversight, much justice-seeking remains reactive and slow, often occurring only after harms have materialized.
The report calls for anticipatory governance with inclusive stakeholder engagement to ensure AI systems serve societal well-being, especially in sectors like labor and health where AI impact is intensifying. It stresses that “tech justice” must be evaluated through practical implementation and power dynamics rather than mere legislation or technological deployment.
Sources
This article is based on reporting and publicly available information from the following source:
Read more World News stories on Goka World News.