The brother of the late Princess Diana has made explosive claims that King Charles III, then Prince Charles, sounded “giddily elated — like a lottery winner” shortly after Diana’s tragic death in 1997. These allegations come from Charles Spencer’s upcoming book, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, set to be published next week, reigniting public scrutiny of the royal family’s response to the princess’s death.
What Happened
Charles Spencer, Diana’s younger brother, revealed in an interview with CBS News that shortly after Diana’s fatal car crash in Paris in August 1997, Prince Charles appeared unusually upbeat. Spencer noted that this tone came about a year after the royal couple’s divorce and during a period when the nation was deeply mourning the princess, who died at age 36. Spencer suggested that Charles’s mood could have been tied to finally feeling free to pursue Camilla Parker Bowles, whom he later married and who is now Queen Camilla.
Earlier claims by Spencer in the same book also allege that days before Diana’s funeral, Charles told him, “we’ll forget her soon enough.” Buckingham Palace issued a strong response, cautioning that grief may cloud memory and judgment, implicitly disputing Spencer’s account. Additional excerpts being released by British media are expected to deepen the controversy.
Key Facts
Princess Diana died in a car crash in Paris in August 1997 at the age of 36. Charles Spencer’s book, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, includes several allegations about the late princess’s relationship with Prince Charles and his demeanor following her death.
Buckingham Palace responded to the initial claims, noting the personal pain associated with grief and warning against letting that “cloud reason, affect judgement and colour memory.” No official comment has been made directly addressing the specific new allegation about Charles sounding “elated.”
What This Means
The revelations from Spencer’s book underscore ongoing fissures and tensions within public perceptions of the British royal family, particularly regarding the legacy of Princess Diana. As one of the most beloved figures in modern British history, Diana’s death remains a sensitive and potent symbol. Allegations that Charles was seemingly glad about her passing clash sharply with the royal family’s carefully maintained image of dignity and respect.
This controversy risks further damaging the public standing of King Charles III and complicating his efforts to unify the monarchy in an era marked by increased scrutiny and demand for transparency. It also highlights the continuing influence of Diana’s memory on British and global perceptions of the royal family. Public reaction appears divided between sympathy for the king and skepticism about the allegations, reflecting broader debates on the monarchy’s relevance and accountability.
Background
Princess Diana and Prince Charles’s tumultuous relationship has been well documented, culminating in their divorce in 1996. Diana’s tragic death in 1997 caused widespread grief and intensified media attention on the royal family. Charles’s subsequent marriage to Camilla Parker Bowles had been a subject of public interest and controversy for years, marking a significant personal and institutional shift for the monarchy.
Charles Spencer’s forthcoming book appears to delve into previously unrevealed personal details and contentious claims about the royal family’s private dynamics during that period.
What Remains Unclear
The full context and veracity of Charles Spencer’s new allegations are not independently verified, and Buckingham Palace has not issued a detailed rebuttal regarding the claim that Charles sounded “elated” after Diana’s death. It is also unclear how much these claims represent personal recollections colored by grief, as Buckingham Palace suggested.
What Comes Next
With the book’s release imminent, further excerpts and claims from Charles Spencer are expected to emerge, likely provoking additional public debate and possibly prompting further responses from the royal family. How Buckingham Palace chooses to address or manage the unfolding controversy will be closely watched.
Sources
This article is based on reporting and publicly available information from the following source:
Read more World News stories on Goka World News.